J. L. ACKRILL, Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes (Clarendon Aristotle Series). Oxford, Clarendon Press, VII, p. Pr. sh. Aristotle’s Categories is a singularly important work of philosophy. It not only .. Ackrill finds Aristotle’s division of quality at best unmotivated. The Categories is a text from Aristotle’s Organon that enumerates all the possible kinds of Aristotle’s own text in Ackrill’s standard English version is: Of things.
|Published (Last):||11 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||7.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.11 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Speech hardly seems like a natural candidate for this category. Perhaps, Aristotle has in mind the quantities of vowels and syllables of Greek words. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A regimen, he says, is healthy because it is productive of health; urine is healthy because it is indicative of health; and Acirill is healthy because he has health.
Hence, it cannot stand firm as a correct set of categories. Kant, for instance, just prior to the articulation of his own categorial scheme, says:.
He says that were primary substances not to exist then no other entity would exist 2b6. Indeed, it is far from clear where ariztotle belongs in the categories. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics3d ed.
Many commentators have thought such a thesis to be deeply problematic. In virtue of its explicitly modal nature, the Modal Approach avoids the defects of the previous two approaches.
Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione
The most fundamental category is substance. The works of Aristotle on Logic. It must be admitted that it is difficult to say exactly what it means to say that a particular is non-accidental. Any sensible particular, substance, event, sound, etc. The Four-Fold Division The Categories divides naturally into three distinct parts — what have come to be known as the Pre-Predicamenta chs. But here it is important to distinguish between internal and external questions concerning a system of categories.
Now, if we accept the characterization of said-of and present-in that I have given, we can see that Aristotle’s two classificatory systems can, so to speak, be laid on top of each other.
Categories and De Interpretatione – Aristotle – Oxford University Press
Francesco Ademollo – – Phronesis 62 3: So, for instance, every material particular must be related to a particular. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. The debate is of interest in large part because it concerns one of the most fundamental metaphysical topics: The commentary is quite good, and as usual, Ariwtotle writes very clearly.
After all, someone might conclude that Aristotle’s categorial scheme was either in part or in whole mistaken.
Likewise, any being is either present-in another or is not present-in another. Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Is Aristotle’s view of substance qckrill the Categories consistent with his view of substance in the Metaphysics?
J. L. Ackrill, Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione – PhilPapers
Clearly, at this point we are in a circle that is too small to be of much help. Although he only gives a negative characterization of primary substances in the Categories — they are neither said-of nor present-in — the examples of them that he provides allow us to form a more robust conception of what a primary substance is supposed to be.
If the Medieval Derivational Approach is correct, Aristotle’s categories ultimately trace aclrill the ways in which form, matter and perhaps motion relate to substances and the predicates that apply to them. Such difficulties understandably lead to questions about the aclrill of category theory and metaphysical speculation in general.
But of course, the difficulty in establishing its ultimate correctness cagegories not peculiar to Aristotle’s categorial scheme. He takes as evidence for his interpretation Aristotle’s remarks in Topics I 9. So, for instance, we might ask — how tall is Socrates? And we can then try to determine what that list is. The resulting structure would look something like the following. Unfortunately, the history of metaphysical speculation has shown that it is no less aristole to establish answers to external than to internal questions about category theory.
The first considers it directly, as a topic of investigation in its own right; see Shields ed. Please try again later. Aristotle’s Categories is a singularly important work of philosophy.
The Categories and the De Interpretatione are very interesting and important works of Aristotle.
Categories and De Interpretatione
Thomas Ainsworth – – Philosophy Compass 13 5: Such words are applicable to various items in the world in virtue of the fact that aristoyle items all bear some type of relation to some one thing or type of thing. The proposals can be classified into four types, which I shall call: Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews.
Instead, he thinks that there are ten: Wikimedia Commons has media related to Categories Aristotle.